The Jan 30 by-election in Bangkok’s Constituency 9 will see a riveting battle between the coalition and opposition camps, but also between uneasy allies within the same bloc.

Analysts say the poll will be a test of rival parties’ popularity with voters ahead of the election for Bangkok governor later this year.

Test of popularity

Yuthaporn Issarachai, a political scientist from Sukhothai Thammathirat Open University (STOU), said the by-election would offer clues to other polls ahead. Meanwhile, parties have already started preparing for the next general election, which is due in 2023 but could be called this year.

That’s why so many parties, old and new alike, are eager to contest for the vacant MP seat. The vote result will help them measure their popularity, noted Yuthaporn.

The by-election was called after ruling Palang Pracharath Party MP Sira Jenjaka lost his seat following a Constitutional Court ruling in late December that he was unqualified to contest the March 2019 general election as he had been convicted of fraud in 1995.

The Constitution prohibits any person convicted in a criminal case from standing for election to the House of Representatives.

“While new political parties can use the by-election to test their popularity in the capital, the big challenge for the old parties will be whether they can retain their political bases [in Bangkok],” said Yuthaporn.

He added that political parties will use the vote result to check their rating among Bangkokians ahead of the crucial gubernatorial election expected around mid this year.

Political analyst Stithorn Thananithichot from King Prajadhipok’s Institute said Bangkok elections often center on tough contests between the two main rival political camps, although candidates from the same bloc also compete for votes.

Among major parties contesting this by-election, the ruling Palang Pracharath Party is seen as sharing its support base with the Kla and Thai Pakdee parties. Opposition- leader Pheu Thai and Move Forward also have overlapping support.

Diverse population

Constituency 9, which covers Lak Si district and part of Chatuchak district, reflects well the capital city’s complex electorate, encompassing a diverse population of working-class and middle-class people, state agencies, and businesses among over 170,000 eligible voters.

Yuthaporn cautioned however that the vote result would not be a definitive measure of the government or opposition’s popularity, as this was a contest in a single constituency.

“We cannot say voters in [Constituency 9] represent all Bangkokians or Thai voters nationwide. The sample size is not big enough,” he said.

The March 2019 general election saw Sira win the MP seat for Constituency 9 with 34,907 votes. Coming in a close second was Surachart Thienthong from Pheu Thai Party with 32,115 votes.

Third place went to Kritsanucha Sunsoen from the now-defunct Future Forward Party, who garnered 25,735 votes. Democrat candidate Wichai Sangprapai came fourth with 16,255 votes, capping a miserable performance in the capital for Thailand’s oldest party.

The upcoming by-election sees a total of eight candidates contesting for the MP seat. Among them are Surachart, who was elected MP for the same constituency in 2011, Sira’s wife and businesswoman Saranrat Jenjaka, who also represents Palang Pracharath, actor-turned-politician Krunphol Tiansuwan from Future Forward’s reincarnation Move Forward, Kla Party secretary-general Atavit Suwannapakdee, and businessman Phanthep Chatnarat from the royalist Thai Pakdee Party.

Frequent victories

Palang Pracharath candidates won the majority of by-elections held last year, beating competitors from both the opposition and from fellow coalition parties.

Critics claim its candidates benefited from government power. And this time observers think Saranrat will be at an advantage since her husband Sira was elected at the last poll.

However, STOU expert Yuthaporn judges that Pheu Thai’s Surachart is the frontrunner. Surachart, son of veteran politician Snoh, is a former MP from the constituency and only lost to Sira by a gap of fewer than 3,000 votes.

“[Using] state power only works well in provincial elections. It’s more difficult in the capital,” Yuthaporn said.

The Democrats have opted out of the contest, citing the “political etiquette” that no party should compete to fill a seat lost by a fellow bloc member. Some observers viewed that move as a slap in the face for Palang Pracharath. The ruling party is eagerly contesting by-elections next Sunday (Jan 16) in the southern provinces of Songkhla and Chumphon for vacant MP seats previously held by the Democrats.

Songkhla MP Thaworn Senneam and Chumphon MP Chumpol Julsai lost their parliamentary seats after the Constitutional Court ruled in early December that jail sentences handed to the two former protest leaders of the People’s Democratic Reform Committee had voided their MP status.

Analysts view the Democrats’ absence from the contest as benefitting new parties Kla and Thai Pakdee, rather than boosting Palang Pracharath’s chances.

Both newcomers have allies among Democrat heavyweights and their candidates enjoy a considerable support base in the constituency.

Atavit won an MP seat for Lak Si in 2008 and for Chatuchak in 2011. His former Democrat colleague, deputy Bangkok governor Sakoltee Phattiyakul, who represented the Lak Si-Chatuchak constituency along with him in 2008, has promised to join Atavit’s latest campaign.

Candidates’ pledges to voters

On the first day of candidacy registration last week, aspiring MPs laid out their promises to voters if elected.

Thai Pakdee’s Phanthep unveiled his party’s policy platform of protecting the monarchy, suppressing corruption, and reducing social inequality.

Kla Party’s Atavit pledged to mediate a conflict between local residents stemming from a project to build embankments along the Prem Prachakon and Lat Phrao canals.

Surachart from Pheu Thai vowed to “strongly scrutinize” the government’s budget spending, particularly on projects related to the COVID-19 crisis, to ensure that taxpayers’ money is spent effectively.

Krunphol from Move Forward pushed for a wider rollout of COVID-19 booster shots for aging residents in the constituency, as the new variant Omicron is spreading fast.

Palang Pracharath’s Saranrat promised to carry on Sira’s work if elected. She said her focus would be on taking care of vulnerable groups, including the disabled and bed-ridden patients.

Source: Thai Public Broadcasting Service (Thai PBS)

By tladmin

You missed

Once known as a “financial wizard”, Indian-born Rakesh Saxena now faces decades in jail for a Thai banking scandal that triggered the 1997 Asian financial crisis. Following a legal battle that dragged on for 26 years, the Supreme Court on September 12 finally sentenced Saxena to 335 years in jail over three lawsuits stemming from the Bangkok Bank of Commerce (BBC) embezzlement scandal. Although the jail sentence of over three centuries was upheld, the 70-year-old will serve only 20 years behind bars, the maximum term under the Thai Penal Code. Working his way up the ladder From 1974 to 1985, Saxena worked as a foreign exchange dealer and money market broker in India, Singapore, Hong Kong, and London. He later moved to Thailand to work as a newspaper financial columnist and consultant to financial institutions. In 1989, while living in Bangkok, he met and befriended Krirkkiat Jalichandra, who had just been appointed as the BBC’s senior vice-president. In 1992, Saxena became a personal advisor to Krirkkiat, who had since been promoted to BBC president. The bank at that time was owned by the family of Krirkkiat’s mother. In his book “BBC Truth”, Krirkkiat wrote that his maternal grandfather, the late former prime minister MR Kukrit Pramoj, had told him: “You have to help with Granddad’s work at the bank.” Krirkkiat had earlier worked at the Bank of Thailand for over a decade. How the scandal unfolded Between 1993 and 1994, the bank spent over 36 billion baht on business takeovers and leveraged buyouts linked with Saxena. The BBC also granted loans with insufficient or overpriced collateral to companies controlled by Saxena, senior bank executives including Krirkkiat, and their associates – many of whom were politicians. The BBC scandal was linked to a clique of young politicians known as the “Group of 16”, many of whom went on to become political heavyweights. Regulators estimated the bank’s bad loans at over 50 billion baht or roughly 40 percent of its assets. Saxena claimed years later that in 1995, BBC officials concealed the number of non-performing loans by lending money to bank-owned shell companies so they could repay debts owed by other borrowers. After the scheme was uncovered, the central bank in February 1996 ordered Krirkkiat to not renew Saxena’s consulting contract. A bank’s collapse Just a month later, the Bank of Thailand took control of the BBC. During a censure debate in early May 1996, opposition MPs from the Democrat Party accused unnamed government politicians of colluding with Saxena and Krirkkiat to “embezzle at least 50 billion baht from the bank’s deposits”. The accusation, coupled with reports of the bank’s deteriorating condition, led to a run on BBC deposits of more than 30 billion baht. That prompted a takeover by the Finance Ministry, which allowed the bank to go bust in August 1998 after discovering an unmanageable level of insolvency. Krirkkiat, Saxena and several others faced 17 court cases on charges of embezzlement and fraud causing damage of over 50 billion baht. The disgraced BBC president was sentenced to 20 years in jail and fined 3.1 billion baht. Krirkkiat died in October 2012 while still serving his prison sentence. Fallout for the economy The BBC scandal led to the closure of a Thai bank that had been operating for over 50 years. Its collapse undermined confidence in the Thai financial system, leading to a domino effect that toppled 56 financial institutions and saw many Thai commercial banks taken over by foreign investors. In July 1997, the Thai government gave in to speculative pressure against the baht and devalued the currency. The move forced neighboring countries to follow suit with their currencies, triggering a financial crisis that swept across Asia. Long legal battle In June 1996, Saxena was in Canada when Thai authorities charged him and others in connection with the BBC scandal. He was arrested a month later but resisted extradition from Canada, claiming he would be killed if he was sent back to Thailand. The extradition battle began in June 1997. More than a decade later, in October 2009, the Supreme Court of Canada ruled against Saxena and he was turned over to Thai authorities. In Thailand, Saxena waged a three-decade legal battle that came to an end this month with a final Supreme Court ruling that sealed his fate. Source: Thai Public Broadcasting Service