Nearly a third never check their bill to verify correct charges and detect suspicious activity

WAKEFIELD, Mass., Dec. 12, 2016 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) — Research commissioned by Xura, Inc, a leading provider of secure, digital communications services, has revealed the extent to which mobile subscribers are unaware of vulnerabilities in their mobile operator’s network that could lead to their calls or texts being intercepted, so becoming victims of fraud or unauthorized location tracking. Only 30 percent of respondents to the survey – conducted with consumers in the US, UK and Australia – claimed awareness of any security weakness in mobile phone networks.

Respondents provided a list of reasons for their security concerns including vulnerabilities in operating systems (nine percent), apps (six percent), operator data leaks (three percent) and vulnerabilities in Bluetooth, WiFi, and voicemail hacking. However, only six percent indicated specific awareness of vulnerabilities in the technology of the telecoms network itself.

Mark Windle, Strategy and Marketing Director, Xura Security, said: “SS7 (Signaling System 7) is a core technology used by telecoms networks globally.  SS7, however, contains vulnerabilities that can be exploited to carry out a whole host of malicious activities; from triggering fraudulent calls or texts to be sent to premium rate services at the subscriber’s expense, to location tracking and call/SMS interception. The threat is very real, but thankfully so too is the solution. Xura is actively helping operators around the world to secure their networks and protect their customers. Naturally some operators move faster than others and those that are yet to act will know the consequences of not protecting themselves and their subscribers against potential attacks. Securing their networks should be the highest priority.”

Shockingly, almost a third (32 percent) of mobile subscribers never check their balance or bill to verify that they have been correctly charged or to detect possible suspicious activity on their account, with those aged between 31 and 50 least likely to check their monthly bills.

“Often these attacks can happen without the mobile user’s knowledge. With fraud, the only indicator may be on the subscriber’s bill. However, we appear to have considerable faith in mobile operators, hence why many of us may not think to suspect any inaccuracies in bills: according to the research over two thirds (69 percent) of subscribers questioned feel they are moderately well protected by their service provider from fraudsters and hackers. Until the network is properly secured, the operator is putting this significant amount of customer loyalty at risk,” continued Windle.

In terms of which hacks would affect subscribers the most, over half of subscribers felt like they would be severely or badly affected by a denial of service attack (58 percent), fraudulent calls and SMS subscriptions respectively (52 percent). Fraud is also the type of hack that subscribers feel is most likely to happen to them, with 45 percent anticipating becoming a victim of fraudulent calls made at their expense, and fraudulent registration for premium SMS services (38 percent).

Subscribers also indicated that if they became a victim of mobile cybercrime, nearly half (49 percent) would seek compensation from their mobile network operator and a third (33 percent) would inform the telecom regulator. Worse still, 29 percent would change their network provider either immediately (22 percent) or at the next renewal date (seven percent).

Windle added: “SS7 attacks leading to fraud are likely to impact subscribers the most, and with consequential impact for the network operators in the form of compensation claims or the loss of angry subscribers to competitors. With security becoming a priority for consumers and enterprises alike, operators have an opportunity to become the trusted provider by moving quickly to combat potential exploitation. By implementing a comprehensive solution that is powerful enough to secure all points of attack, not only blocking suspicious activity but also using advanced analytics to help secure the network against future attacks, the operator can detect, protect and secure their network assets, data and ultimately their subscribers.”

Other key findings:

  • 22 percent of subscribers don’t implement any rules when they decide to grant apps permission to access other features or data on their phone
  • Only eight percent would switch to apps to make calls and send messages more securely than through traditional voice calls and SMS messages
  • 24 percent would change their number if attacked
  • 14 percent would report the hack on their social networks

“Despite a reasonable degree of awareness to potential threats, many subscribers (42 percent) increase their exposure to risk by not checking bills or not paying attention to app permissions. As subscribers, we need to take more care and be more vigilant. However, cybercrime conducted through SS7 vulnerabilities in the network may be completely invisible to consumers. The right place to tackle these threats is in the network, but right now many networks are not adequately protected from potential signaling attacks. Now is the time for the operators to join the fight against cybercrime,” concluded Windle.

To highlight the findings of the research, Xura created an infographic which explores the rise of mobile cybercrime, how mobile users are at risk, often without their knowledge, and some practical tips everyone can take to better protect themselves. To view the infographic, please click here: http://bit.ly/MobileCybercrime

About the research
Carried out in Quarter Three 2016, the research was conducted by Xura via Survey Monkey, and questioned 1,667 mobile network subscribers in the USA (595), UK (535), and Australia (537). A breakdown of findings by country are available on request.

About Xura, Inc.
Xura, Inc. offers a portfolio of digital services solutions that enable global communications across a variety of mobile devices and platforms. We help communication service providers and enterprises navigate and monetize the digital ecosystem to create innovative, new experiences through our cloud-based offerings. Our solutions touch more than three billion people through 350+ service providers and enterprises in 140+ countries.  You can find us at Xura.com.

Media Contact:
Maria Hudson
Xura
maria.hudson@xura.com

You missed

Once known as a “financial wizard”, Indian-born Rakesh Saxena now faces decades in jail for a Thai banking scandal that triggered the 1997 Asian financial crisis. Following a legal battle that dragged on for 26 years, the Supreme Court on September 12 finally sentenced Saxena to 335 years in jail over three lawsuits stemming from the Bangkok Bank of Commerce (BBC) embezzlement scandal. Although the jail sentence of over three centuries was upheld, the 70-year-old will serve only 20 years behind bars, the maximum term under the Thai Penal Code. Working his way up the ladder From 1974 to 1985, Saxena worked as a foreign exchange dealer and money market broker in India, Singapore, Hong Kong, and London. He later moved to Thailand to work as a newspaper financial columnist and consultant to financial institutions. In 1989, while living in Bangkok, he met and befriended Krirkkiat Jalichandra, who had just been appointed as the BBC’s senior vice-president. In 1992, Saxena became a personal advisor to Krirkkiat, who had since been promoted to BBC president. The bank at that time was owned by the family of Krirkkiat’s mother. In his book “BBC Truth”, Krirkkiat wrote that his maternal grandfather, the late former prime minister MR Kukrit Pramoj, had told him: “You have to help with Granddad’s work at the bank.” Krirkkiat had earlier worked at the Bank of Thailand for over a decade. How the scandal unfolded Between 1993 and 1994, the bank spent over 36 billion baht on business takeovers and leveraged buyouts linked with Saxena. The BBC also granted loans with insufficient or overpriced collateral to companies controlled by Saxena, senior bank executives including Krirkkiat, and their associates – many of whom were politicians. The BBC scandal was linked to a clique of young politicians known as the “Group of 16”, many of whom went on to become political heavyweights. Regulators estimated the bank’s bad loans at over 50 billion baht or roughly 40 percent of its assets. Saxena claimed years later that in 1995, BBC officials concealed the number of non-performing loans by lending money to bank-owned shell companies so they could repay debts owed by other borrowers. After the scheme was uncovered, the central bank in February 1996 ordered Krirkkiat to not renew Saxena’s consulting contract. A bank’s collapse Just a month later, the Bank of Thailand took control of the BBC. During a censure debate in early May 1996, opposition MPs from the Democrat Party accused unnamed government politicians of colluding with Saxena and Krirkkiat to “embezzle at least 50 billion baht from the bank’s deposits”. The accusation, coupled with reports of the bank’s deteriorating condition, led to a run on BBC deposits of more than 30 billion baht. That prompted a takeover by the Finance Ministry, which allowed the bank to go bust in August 1998 after discovering an unmanageable level of insolvency. Krirkkiat, Saxena and several others faced 17 court cases on charges of embezzlement and fraud causing damage of over 50 billion baht. The disgraced BBC president was sentenced to 20 years in jail and fined 3.1 billion baht. Krirkkiat died in October 2012 while still serving his prison sentence. Fallout for the economy The BBC scandal led to the closure of a Thai bank that had been operating for over 50 years. Its collapse undermined confidence in the Thai financial system, leading to a domino effect that toppled 56 financial institutions and saw many Thai commercial banks taken over by foreign investors. In July 1997, the Thai government gave in to speculative pressure against the baht and devalued the currency. The move forced neighboring countries to follow suit with their currencies, triggering a financial crisis that swept across Asia. Long legal battle In June 1996, Saxena was in Canada when Thai authorities charged him and others in connection with the BBC scandal. He was arrested a month later but resisted extradition from Canada, claiming he would be killed if he was sent back to Thailand. The extradition battle began in June 1997. More than a decade later, in October 2009, the Supreme Court of Canada ruled against Saxena and he was turned over to Thai authorities. In Thailand, Saxena waged a three-decade legal battle that came to an end this month with a final Supreme Court ruling that sealed his fate. Source: Thai Public Broadcasting Service