The digital assets industry is up in arms over the Revenue Department’s plan to levy tax on capital gains or benefits derived from cryptocurrencies and other digital asset transactions.

With the two parties being at loggerheads, consultations have begun between tax officials and concerned parties to resolve the conflict.

The department has promised to conclude the matter only by the end of January even as a hot debate rages on whether the government should collect taxes on digital assets, or how such tax can be levied fairly.

Defining cryptocurrencies

In May 2018, the government issued the Emergency Decree on Digital Assets Business 2561, aiming to regulate digital assets businesses covering trading, exchanges, brokerages, traders, and other related businesses.

At the same time, the government amended the Revenue Code, adding income and gains derived from digital assets as assessable income, also subject to a 15 percent withholding tax. Non-residents are also covered by the withholding tax.

Implementation of tax collection, however, has not begun. Digital assets comprise cryptocurrencies and digital tokens, which have been increasingly gaining in popularity in recent years. According to tax officials, cryptocurrencies are defined as assets, not as cash.

Individual Thai investors traded cryptocurrencies worth over Bt1 trillion last year via digital asset exchanges in Thailand, according to a trade data report on the Securities and Exchange Commission’s website. The trading amount is huge for 605,000 Thai investor accounts out of nearly 2 million investor accounts as of December.

The top three trading coins were: Bitcoin, Ethereum, and Cardona, while Thailand-based coins are Bitkub Coin, JFIN, and SIX.

Low bank deposit rates combined with speculation may push investors seeking higher returns into the market despite warnings from the Bank of Thailand and other experts on the volatile nature of digital assets.

Tax collection

According to tax officials, those who engage in coin mining also will be subject to taxation on the sale of coins. Investment in computer hardware, software, building rent, and electricity bill will be counted as the cost of the operation under the calculation formula of taxable income. Digital assets received by anyone will be treated as his or her revenue.

Those who sell digital assets and make capital gains are subject to 15 percent withholding tax. They have to inform buyers of the investment cost for those assets.

Taxpayers have to include such capital gains as taxable income in their annual personal income tax returns and the 15 percent withholding tax paid would be taken into account in determining their final tax liability.

Capital gains tax would be levied on each transaction. However, losses incurred on other transactions will not count for tax exemption from the Revenue Department. The idea of taxing gains while ignoring losses has raised the question of fairness for the taxpayer.

Debate on fair treatment

Former finance minister Korn Chatikavanij has urged the Revenue Department to clarify several points before it starts collecting taxes.

He said an investor selling his cryptocurrency on a digital asset exchange does not know who is buying it, raising questions on the practicality of implementing withholding tax.

Some countries like Australia, the US, the UK, and Canada have imposed capital gains tax, but they also allow investors to adjust losses incurred in other transactions from their taxable income, said Korn who is also the leader of the Kla Party.

South Korea allows tax exemption on the first capital gains amount not exceeding 2.5 million won (around Bt70,000).

As the Revenue Department treats crypto tokens as goods, this means that crypto trading might be subject to value-added tax (VAT). So those who sell digital assets worth over Bt1.8 million a year may have to register for VAT with the Revenue Department, Korn argued.

Others are worried that investors could move to foreign exchanges where there is no capital gains tax, such as Singapore, Malaysia, and Hong Kong.

Athipath Muthitacharoen, associate professor at Chulalongkorn University’s Faculty of Economics, however, supports a tax on digital assets. “The revenue department has to implement the tax law. The current debate is focused on the wrong point,” he said.

The law authorizes tax officials to collect tax on profit from a transaction, but it does not offer tax relief for losses in other transactions. So, if the government wants to make the law reasonable and fair to taxpayers, it has to propose to Parliament to amend it, he suggested.

“As a short-term solution, the government could exempt crypto trading from tax, but it would be equal to sweeping the problems under the carpet,” he warned.

Lack of tax reform

A milestone in tax reform happened in 1992 when Thailand introduced the VAT.

Critics have blamed successive Thai governments for fully collecting taxes from wage earners, but getting proportionally less from the wealth of financial investors and millionaires. An inheritance tax, as well as land and property taxes, have been introduced in recent years, but the tax rates are too low to make any significant socio-economic change.

The government is under high pressure to increase sources of revenue to finance persistent budget deficits. Many experts believe the current tax system has contributed towards widening inequality between the rich and the poor.

Source: Thai Public Broadcasting Service

By tladmin

You missed

Once known as a “financial wizard”, Indian-born Rakesh Saxena now faces decades in jail for a Thai banking scandal that triggered the 1997 Asian financial crisis. Following a legal battle that dragged on for 26 years, the Supreme Court on September 12 finally sentenced Saxena to 335 years in jail over three lawsuits stemming from the Bangkok Bank of Commerce (BBC) embezzlement scandal. Although the jail sentence of over three centuries was upheld, the 70-year-old will serve only 20 years behind bars, the maximum term under the Thai Penal Code. Working his way up the ladder From 1974 to 1985, Saxena worked as a foreign exchange dealer and money market broker in India, Singapore, Hong Kong, and London. He later moved to Thailand to work as a newspaper financial columnist and consultant to financial institutions. In 1989, while living in Bangkok, he met and befriended Krirkkiat Jalichandra, who had just been appointed as the BBC’s senior vice-president. In 1992, Saxena became a personal advisor to Krirkkiat, who had since been promoted to BBC president. The bank at that time was owned by the family of Krirkkiat’s mother. In his book “BBC Truth”, Krirkkiat wrote that his maternal grandfather, the late former prime minister MR Kukrit Pramoj, had told him: “You have to help with Granddad’s work at the bank.” Krirkkiat had earlier worked at the Bank of Thailand for over a decade. How the scandal unfolded Between 1993 and 1994, the bank spent over 36 billion baht on business takeovers and leveraged buyouts linked with Saxena. The BBC also granted loans with insufficient or overpriced collateral to companies controlled by Saxena, senior bank executives including Krirkkiat, and their associates – many of whom were politicians. The BBC scandal was linked to a clique of young politicians known as the “Group of 16”, many of whom went on to become political heavyweights. Regulators estimated the bank’s bad loans at over 50 billion baht or roughly 40 percent of its assets. Saxena claimed years later that in 1995, BBC officials concealed the number of non-performing loans by lending money to bank-owned shell companies so they could repay debts owed by other borrowers. After the scheme was uncovered, the central bank in February 1996 ordered Krirkkiat to not renew Saxena’s consulting contract. A bank’s collapse Just a month later, the Bank of Thailand took control of the BBC. During a censure debate in early May 1996, opposition MPs from the Democrat Party accused unnamed government politicians of colluding with Saxena and Krirkkiat to “embezzle at least 50 billion baht from the bank’s deposits”. The accusation, coupled with reports of the bank’s deteriorating condition, led to a run on BBC deposits of more than 30 billion baht. That prompted a takeover by the Finance Ministry, which allowed the bank to go bust in August 1998 after discovering an unmanageable level of insolvency. Krirkkiat, Saxena and several others faced 17 court cases on charges of embezzlement and fraud causing damage of over 50 billion baht. The disgraced BBC president was sentenced to 20 years in jail and fined 3.1 billion baht. Krirkkiat died in October 2012 while still serving his prison sentence. Fallout for the economy The BBC scandal led to the closure of a Thai bank that had been operating for over 50 years. Its collapse undermined confidence in the Thai financial system, leading to a domino effect that toppled 56 financial institutions and saw many Thai commercial banks taken over by foreign investors. In July 1997, the Thai government gave in to speculative pressure against the baht and devalued the currency. The move forced neighboring countries to follow suit with their currencies, triggering a financial crisis that swept across Asia. Long legal battle In June 1996, Saxena was in Canada when Thai authorities charged him and others in connection with the BBC scandal. He was arrested a month later but resisted extradition from Canada, claiming he would be killed if he was sent back to Thailand. The extradition battle began in June 1997. More than a decade later, in October 2009, the Supreme Court of Canada ruled against Saxena and he was turned over to Thai authorities. In Thailand, Saxena waged a three-decade legal battle that came to an end this month with a final Supreme Court ruling that sealed his fate. Source: Thai Public Broadcasting Service