Bangkok: Anusorn Iamsaard, a Pheu Thai Party list MP, has criticized the government for what he perceives as a lack of direction and consistency, which he claims has led to a decline in its popularity. Anusorn specifically targeted Prime Minister and Interior Minister Anutin Charnvirakul, accusing him of frequently changing positions on critical issues, including international trade and diplomatic relations.
According to Thai News Agency, Anusorn highlighted Anutin's fluctuating stance on the impact of Trump-era tariffs and the country's ability to maintain international trade relationships. Anusorn noted that Anutin had previously apologized for statements regarding Thailand's territorial disputes with Cambodia and expressed concerns about the country's trade strategy in light of these tariffs. Anusorn suggested that Anutin may need to apologize again for his inconsistent remarks on these matters.
Anusorn's comments come in the context of Anutin's role in signing a peace statement between Thailand and Cambodia, witnessed by key international figures, including US President Donald Trump and Malaysian Prime Minister Anwar Ibrahim. Anusorn criticized the government's handling of various domestic issues, including border tensions, economic challenges, and natural disasters, which he argues have further eroded public confidence in the government.
The Minister of Commerce has stated that the United States remains a vital trading partner for Thailand, prompting public speculation about the government's overall strategy and its future trade partners. Anusorn questioned Anutin's diplomatic approach and the potential repercussions of any conflict with the US, urging the government to clarify its position and avoid further confusion.
Anusorn emphasized the need for clarity and consistency from the government, arguing that the current approach risks damaging national interests and undermining peacebuilding efforts. He also called on the opposition party to take responsibility for the ongoing crisis of confidence, suggesting that their differing perspectives contribute to the current turmoil.